By Kemi Yesufu
Abuja lawyer, Dr. Kayode Ajulo, has advised against the twitter ban by the Federal Government, saying prosecuting Nigerians still tweeting runs contrary to the 1999 Constitution (As amended).
Ajulo in a personally signed statement said the decision to ban the use of the micro-blogging site by Nigerian Tweeps as announced by the Federal Government, “ runs contrary to the Letters and the spirit of the Constitution and same anachronistic in a democractic society where rule of law ought to be the guiding compass”.
“Without prejudice to the rationale for the ban of the blogging site, it must be noted that the Nigerian democracy is a constitutional democracy based on the rule of law. Where the rule of law reigns, political expediency ought to be sacrificed on the altar of the rule of law so as to guarantee the continued existence of democratic institutions fashioned to promote social values of liberty, orderly conduct and development.
“The Constitution of a nation is the fons et origo, not only of the jurisprudence but also of the legal system of the nation. It is the beginning and the end of the legal system. In Greek language, it is the alpha and the omega and the barometer with which Government actions are measured. Without prejudice to the rationale for the ban of the blogging site in Nigeria, it is imperative to note that the provisions of Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution are clear to the effect no one shall be prosecuted for an offence not known to Law”, the statement read in part.
“For the sake of emphasis and for avoidance of doubt, Section 36 (12) provides as follows: Subject as otherwise provided by this Constitution, a person shall not be convicted of a criminal offence unless that offence is defined and the penalty therefore is prescribed in a written law, and in this subsection, a written law refers to an Act of the National Assembly or a Law of a State, any subsidiary legislation or instrument under the provisions of a law.
“The cases of Aoko Vs. Fagbemi (1961) 1 All NLR 400; A.G.F. Vs. Isong (1986) 1QLRN 75 are also quite pungent on this. I have carefully spectated the contents of our various penal laws and nowhere is a Citizen of the Country prohibited from receiving or disseminating information which as a right guaranteed under Section 39 of the Constitution.